Google
Submit your scientific PR or story here
  • Headlines
  • Tech
  • Space
  • Animals
  • Earth
  • Science
  • Food
  • Culture
  • Health

Dealing with taxonomic uncertainty for threatened and endangered species

By ScienceMode on Feb 13th, 2009 in Headlines, SM | Add story link to StumbleUpon

As part of a symposium on “Defining species for threatened and endangered protection” Barbara Taylor, Ph.D., NOAA Fisheries Service, will discuss the need to explicitly consider uncertainty in taxonomy in conservation decisions. Species concepts continue to be a contentious, but largely philosophical debate among academic biologists. How differences between groups of organisms are identified, however, can have real, on-the-ground policy implications for which species receive legal protection under the federal Endangered Species Act.

Taylor brings her experience in designing management decision rules that acknowledge and deal with the high level of uncertainty resulting from typical cases with a dearth of data. She points out that while many fields of conservation science have advanced on how to make decisions when uncertainty is high, taxonomy has not.

Taxonomy has been an evidentiary field requiring a strong burden of proof to propose taxonomic changes such as new species. The high data requirement, particularly requiring morphological data from skull collections, has resulted in certain taxonomic groups (like whales) being at a disadvantage and likely under-representing the true taxonomic diversity.

Taylor illustrates the problem of taxonomic uncertainty with a case involving killer whales, which will likely be separated into multiple species or sub-species. The petition to list Southern Resident killer whales under the ESA revolved not around risk but rather on whether these whales met the definition of Distinct Population Segment used as the smallest unit to conserve under the ESA.

Taylor discusses the potential of incorporating uncertainty into taxonomic considerations, as is commonly done in other biological fields, to allow precautionary decision-making for the purposes of conservation. She illustrates such a possible route using a decision table that uses information on both risk and the likelihood of attaining more data quickly to place potential species or sub-species as designated for conservation purposes.

Source: NOAA Headquarters

Post this story to:    Del.icio.us    Digg this    Newsvine    Nowpublic    Reddit


Comments are closed.

Latest Science News

  • McGill-UBC project creates mouse grimace scale to help identify pain in humans and animals
  • Swine Flu Vaccine Breakthrough?
  • 1 moose, 2 moose: Scientist seeks correction in number of species
  • Why the thumb of the right hand is on the left hand side
  • How superbugs control their lethal weapons
  • P[acman]-generated fruit fly gene ‘library’: A new research tool
  • Yeast missing sex genes undergo unexpected sexual reproduction
  • Discovery in amber reveals ancient biology of termites
  • Scientists learn why the flu may turn deadly
  • GE Reveals 500-Gigabyte Disc Breakthrough
  • Missing planets attest to destructive power of stars’ tides
  • Large sponges may be reattached to coral reefs
  • Quantum ghosts are helpful
  • Swine Flu Worries and Simple Solutions to Fighting off the Bug
  • Fire is an important and under-appreciated part of global climate change
  • Texas has more farms, fewer acres, new study shows
  • Bovine genome provides clues to possible new developments
  • New challenge to galaxy formation theories
  • The role of inbreeding in the extinction of the Spanish Habsburg dynasty
  • Mangroves save lives in storms, study of 1999 super cyclone finds
  • NASA spacecraft show three dimensional anatomy of a solar storm
  • Test quickly assesses whether Alzheimer’s drugs are hitting their target
  • Imaging and discovery from USArray and EarthScope
  • Ancestors of African Pygmies and neighboring farmers separated around 60,000 years ago
  • Scientists pinpoint the ‘edge of space’

ScienceMode © 2006-2008 - About us

Log in